Quantcast
Channel: Features
Viewing all 61683 articles
Browse latest View live

3 maps that explain North Korea's strategy

$
0
0

kim jong un

To understand North Korean strategy today, we must first understand the implications of its geography.

Korea is a peninsula jutting southward from Manchuria surrounded by the Yellow and Japan seas. It shares an 880-mile-wide border with China and has a 30-mile frontier with Russia.

Korea's northeastern border is about 70 miles from Vladivostok, Russia's major eastern port. The southeast corner juts to within 100 miles of Japan to its south, and the peninsula's southwest shore angles westward only about 300 miles from Shanghai.

Editor's note: This article was originally written in 2016.

The Korean Peninsula and surrounding area

The Korean Peninsula, therefore, poses a potential threat to three major powers—not because of what any government on the Korean Peninsula might do, but simply because of its geographical position.

Korea could threaten Japan's access to the East China Sea and the Pacific from the Sea of Japan. Korea can also potentially interfere with China's access to the Yellow Sea and potentially to Shanghai.

Japan and China have invaded the Korean Peninsula on several occasions. Its geographical position and size relative to Japan and China made these incursions inevitable.

For that reason, it has been invaded by both China and Japan at various points throughout history — and later by the Soviet Union and the US.

The motivation behind the invasions has not been so much to capture the wealth of Korea, which was minimal, as it has been the fact that the country can provide strategic springboards or blocks to major powers.

Korea was a critical piece in any Chinese or Japanese strategy.



China, Russia, and the US divided Korea after World War II

The end of World War II did not reduce Korea's importance. It simply eliminated one player, Japan, and introduced a new one, the United States. The American presence in Korea was not actually new, though.

The defeat of Japan in World War II ended Japanese hegemony over Korea. The Yalta Conference created a four-power joint government in Korea, but that coalition failed, as did a similar joint government in Berlin.

As in Berlin, Korea was divided — with Soviet troops and their Korean supporters occupying the land north of the 38th parallel and the Americans and their Korean supporters occupying the south.

The US did not see South Korea as a critical strategic asset, but the Soviets and the Chinese saw an opportunity. The Soviets had suffered a defeat in Berlin when their blockade failed because of the American airlift. They also saw Korea as a threat to Vladivostok should the US regain interest.

The Chinese were similarly concerned about a later shift in American interest and wanted to expel the Americans from the peninsula. Again, it was Korean geography that mattered.

The North Korean invasion of South Korea in June 1950 took the US by surprise: US intelligence had failed to detect North Korea's act of aggression on the ground.

President Harry Truman faced a critical decision. Technically, Korea was not critical to US national security. But Truman calculated that Korea's strategic position would protect Japan, and defending South Korea would make clear that the US would resist open aggression.

Truman's decision, made in a weekend, created modern northeast Asia by making the US the guarantor of South Korean national security.

War, however, was extremely difficult to wage on the Korean Peninsula. One of the main reasons was the terrain of the Korean Peninsula. It is narrow — about 200 miles wide at its narrowest — and about 500 miles long. It is also covered with very rugged hills.

A relatively small force, using the rugged terrain cleverly, can hold off a larger force, retreating slowly and inflicting casualties on the attacker, who has to come out from under cover.

During temporary positions of surprise or imbalance, it is possible to drive the defender back. But the Korean War showed that, while it is possible to drive the enemy back, it is not possible to simply wipe it out.

Another reason is the strategic reality that no major regional power can afford to allow the peninsula to fall completely into the hands of a hostile power.

This set of dynamics created the current situation in Korea. The peninsula is divided into two states — one with the full support of the US, the other at the moment in a much more complex relationship with China, its traditional patron.



North Korea became a puppet of the China-Russia Alliance

South Korea has emerged as one of the major industrial powers in the world. One reason for its economic success is the American grand strategy of maintaining a long-term commitment to defend South Korea.

But a strategic relationship with the US carries with it both benefits and risks. The major risk is war. The major benefit is that the US tilts the table in favor of the client state.

North Korea's relationship with China and Russia has not resulted in similar benefits.

The map above displays light visible from space at night. South Korea is ablaze, China less so, but with intense areas. North Korea, on the other hand, is virtually without light, or to be more precise, without enough clustered lighting to be seen from space.

Both South Korea and North Korea were devastated by the Korean War. But while South Korea has transformed into a modern industrial power, North Korea appears to be preindustrial — or so it appears, based on nighttime lighting.

How did this disjuncture occur? The Chinese and the Russians had fewer resources to invest in North Korea than the US had to invest in the South. But the complete answer must be somewhat more complex.

Even on their own, the North Koreans should have been able to generate greater economic growth than they have. And certainly, after the fall of the Soviet Union, the Chinese could have aided North Korea more fully had they wished to do so.

The rest of the answer has to do with the nature of the North Korean regime. The first strategy of any state is its preservation. North Korea was faced with a major US force and an increasingly powerful South Korean force. The logical thing would have been for the Chinese and Soviets to create an equivalent force. They chose not to.

The Chinese and Russians did not want a powerful North Korea because it could turn against them. They wanted a buffer state between themselves and American forces in the south. Therefore, the Russians and the Chinese together created a paradox in North Korea.

Both the Soviets and Chinese understood that simply being communist was no longer sufficient grounds for an alliance. The Soviets and the Chinese had become enemies in spite of a shared ideology. Neither wanted the other to use North Korea as a tool against it.

We should add that South Korea and the US themselves were not eager to see the North Korean regime fall. South Korea did not want to bear the expense and risks involved in reintegration. The US was content with the status quo in the Korean Peninsula, as its primary interest there was minimal conflict.

And out of this paradoxical strategy emerged the contemporary North Korean state.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

20 images that show how much we've reshaped planet Earth in the past 70 years

$
0
0

mountain

April 22 is Earth Day, a world holiday celebrating our planet — the only home we've got (so far).

Humans have had an unmistakable impact on Earth — one that pops out in sharp relief when you look at this collection of images comparing what specific areas look like now to how they appeared in the past.

In some cases, the images (mostly from NASA, unless otherwise noted) were taken as far as 50 years apart; in other cases, they were snapped with just 10-15 years in between.

SEE ALSO: Earth entered a new epoch on July 16, 1945 — and that's just the beginning of how humans have changed the planet

DON'T MISS: Ancient plaque on 50,000-year-old Neanderthal teeth reveal the real 'paleo diet'

Photographs from the 1940s to the 2000s show the drastic impact of climate change on our planet's glaciers. Here is a photo of Alaska's Muir Glacier, pictured in August 1941 (left) and August 2004 (right).



Here's the snow that remained on Matterhorn Mountain in Switzerland in August 1960 (left), compared with August 2005 (right).



Starting in the 1970s, NASA began using satellite images to document deforestation in several national parks around the world. Here's Mount Elgon National Park in Uganda in 1973 (left), compared with the park in 2005 (right).



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

This might be the tiniest laptop in the world right now

$
0
0

gpd pocket

Remember netbooks? The tiny ultra-portable laptops? One Chinese tech company is bringing them back.

The GPD Pocket is an absolutely tiny laptop that runs the full version of Windows 10, and it fits in your pocket.

It might sound like a netbook, but its premium build and decent specs differentiates it from traditional netbooks that felt cheap and were incredibly underpowered.

The GPD Pocket went through an Indiegogo campaign that raised over $3 million. Unfortunately, the campaign is closed, and there's no way to pre-order a unit right now. The Indiegogo page says the first GPD Pockets will ship in June, but it's unclear when they'll be widely available to buy after that.

Take a look:

SEE ALSO: There's a strange corner of the internet that loves to look at pictures of incredibly dirty computers

The GPD Pocket is a tiny laptop with a 7-inch touchscreen that runs the full version of Windows 10.

It weighs in at just over one pound.



It is truly tiny.



And fits in large pockets.

 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Amazon is discounting thousands of their warehouse deals for Earth Day — here are 5 of the best ones

$
0
0

The Insider Picks team writes about stuff we think you'll like. Business Insider has affiliate partnerships, so we get a share of the revenue from your purchase.

71Ex3T9oPmL._SL1500_Amazon's Warehouse Deals is one of my favorite little-known parts of the site. 

It's the place where Amazon sells refurbished and open-box products at a discount. 

These products include Prime shipping and are covered by Amazon's A-z guarantee, and each one comes with a description of the physical condition of the product.

In honor of Earth Day, Amazon is discounting thousands of warehouse deals by 20% through Saturday, April 22. This sale includes items across dozens of product categories, and while you can search through all of them, we've rounded up five of the best tech discounts. 

Whether you're looking for a phone case, or a more affordable way to pick up an Apple Watch, you can find what you're looking for here. The discount is applied at final checkout, so I've provided that price here for your convenience.

DON'T MISS: Amazon's store brand makes a lot of great tech, but these are the 10 gadgets actually worth buying

SEE ALSO: 20 must-have tech accessories under $20

iOttie iTap Magnetic Air Vent Premium Car Mount

Using a car mount helps you keep your eyes on the road, which makes everyone safer. iOttie's minimalist option will magnetically attach to your phone and won't take up a lot of space.

iOttie iTap Magnetic Air Vent Premium Car Mount, $16.68, available at Amazon

[$24.95 new]



Spigen Liquid Crystal iPhone 7 Plus Case

If you're in the market for a slim, clear case for your iPhone 7 Plus, Spigen's option is simple and protects the back and sides of your phone.

Spigen Liquid Crystal iPhone 7 Plus Case, from $6.43, available at Amazon

[$11.99 new]



mophie juice pack wireless and charging base

If you have trouble keeping your phone alive, or want to try wireless charging, mophie's juice pack is worth trying. I tested one and the results were impressive.

mophie juice pack wireless and charging base, from $48.65, available at Amazon

[$69.99 new]



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

25 places you should visit before they disappear forever

$
0
0

The Dead Sea


Earth is home to incredibly beautiful natural sites. But because of climate change and human carelessness, some of them are in danger of disappearing in the next 100 years — or even sooner.

From Patagonia's glaciers to Africa's Congo Basin, these threatened natural wonders span the globe.

Keep scrolling to see where you should visit sooner rather than later.

Talia Avakian contributed reporting to an earlier version of this article.

SEE ALSO: 20 photos that show where world leaders live

The Seychelles

A popular destination for honeymooners or paradise-seekers, the islands of the Seychelles — located in the Indian Ocean off the coast of Madagascar — are vanishing because of beach erosion. They're in danger of completely disappearing in the next 50 to 100 years.

Source: Time



Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania

The picturesque snow that tops Mount Kilimanjaro in Tanzania may not be there much longer. Between the years of 1912 and 2007, Kilimanjaro's ice sheet shrank by a whopping 85%.

Source: CNN



The Mirador Basin and Tikal National Park, Guatemala

The Mirador Basin and Tikal National Park in Guatemala are home to the mysterious ruins of the Mayan civilization. Illegal looting and forest burning, however, may destroy this piece of history.

Source: UNESCO



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

40 amazing cars that dominated the 2017 Shanghai Auto Show

$
0
0

Lamborghini Shanghai auto show

Over the past decade, China has emerged as a force to be reckoned with in the automotive universe. For most car makers, the Middle Kingdom is either first or second on its list of priorities. Thus, it is only fitting that the 2016-2017 auto show season would come to a conclusion in China's most cosmopolitan city.

The Shanghai motor show presents Chinese consumers with an opportunity to see the latest and greatest offerings from around the world. At the same time, the world's press has the chance to evaluate the newest developments from China's growing contingent of automakers.

The 2017 Shanghai Auto Show is open to the public until April 28 at the National Exhibition and Convention Center.

SEE ALSO: 28 hot cars at the 2017 New York Auto Show

At this year's show, it is all about the new SUV concepts and production vehicles from China's many domestic brands. Some of the highlights include this HB03 Hybrid and...



... H6 SUV rom Haval as well as...



... the attractive Vision E Concept and...



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

11 exclusive events around the world where you're most likely to spot a billionaire this summer

$
0
0

Cartier Queens Cup polo

The world's richest people spend much of their time working to earn their fortunes. But they also make time for fun, and that often includes making appearances at some of the world's most exclusive events.

Wealth-X, a company that conducts research on the ultra-wealthy, recently released its annual billionaire census, which includes the typical social calendar of a high-powered billionaire.

Here, we've highlighted the 11 events taking place from May to August this year where you're most likely to spot a billionaire.

We've also included info, provided by Wealth-X, about the billionaires who typically attend these events. From the Cannes Film Festival to Wimbledon to Burning Man, here's where the world's wealthiest spend their free time.

SEE ALSO: The 18 countries with the most millionaires

DON'T MISS: Thanks to a little-known airline hack, traveling around the world could be cheaper than you realize

MAY: Concorso D'Eleganza Villa D'Este

The Concorso D'Eleganza Villa D'Este is an annual showcase of 50 of the world's most beautiful cars built from the 1920s to the 1980s, held on the shores of Italy's Lake Como.

The event is sponsored by BMW, which presents one car owner with the Best in Show award every year. In 2013, that honor went to noted American clothing designer Ralph Lauren — who commands a $5.2 billion fortune — for his 1938 Bugatti 57SC Atlantic.



MAY: Cannes Film Festival

Entertainment's most talented actors, artists, directors, and producers head to Cannes, France, each May to attend the Cannes Film Festival. The 11-day fête is one of the most significant stages for European cinema, its massive red carpet a symbol of the festival's glamour and prestige.

Every year, Paul Allen, the Microsoft cofounder with a net worth of $19.6 billion, hosts an exclusive party teeming with celebrities aboard his $150 million, 414-foot yacht named Octopus.



MAY: Formula One Monaco Grand Prix

One-third of the Triple Crown of Motorsport, the Monaco Grand Prix is one of the most prestigious auto races in the world, held each May along the French Riviera in Monte Carlo.

Monaco's royal family is a mainstay at the Formula One world championship, as is Mansour Akram Ojjeh, the CEO of TAG Group, a huge player in luxury aviation and motorsports. Ojjeh, whose fortune stands at nearly $2 billion, invested millions in McLaren Technology and was instrumental in founding the McLaren Formula One team.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

5 sobering charts that show how many resources Americans use and waste

$
0
0

Times Square New Years Eve trash

The United States is the third most populous nation on Earth, with about 319 million inhabitants. So it's no surprise the country uses a lot of resources — and makes an incredible amount of waste.

Americans enjoy practically unlimited access to food, water, energy, and other resources that power a modern society. This makes US residents some of the most resource-intensive human beings on Earth.

The average person born in the US creates 13 times as much damage to the environment as someone born in Brazil, uses 35 times the resources of a typical person in India, and consumes about 53 times more products than people who live in China, according to Scientific American. Also, the lifestyle of Americans is second only to that of Canadians in generating the most greenhouse gases per person.

The following five data-driven charts, which Business Insider assembled for Earth Day, help illustrate the disproportionate ecological footprint Americans have on our planet.

SEE ALSO: 10 gut-wrenching pleas from astronauts to save planet Earth

DON'T MISS: A forgotten war technology could safely power Earth for millions of years. Here's why we aren't using it







See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Here's what's behind the US-Canada dairy spat that has Chuck Schumer agreeing with Trump

$
0
0

Donald Trump

President Donald Trump whipped Canadian lawmakers into a froth this week, accusing the country of taking advantage of US dairy farmers and calling for an overhaul of the North American Free Trade Agreement.

"What they've done to our dairy farm workers is a disgrace. It's a disgrace,"Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday.

His comments followed a Tuesday incident in Wisconsin, where his speech on the "Buy American, Hire American" executive order devolved into a rant hammering Canada's dairy supply management system:

"We're going to get together and we're going to call Canada, and we're going to say, 'What happened?' And they might give us an answer, but we're going to get the solution, not just the answer. OK? Because we know what the solution is," he said.

In fact, American lawmakers have had extensive communication with their Canadian counterparts over the past year. They've not only called Canada, but written Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and met with his cabinet officials about the country's dairy pricing policies. Even former President Obama privately complained to Trudeau that the country's policies were harming US exporters, according to the Canadian Press.

But no solutions have emerged, and lawmakers from each country appear to be gearing up for souring NAFTA negotiations, in which a showdown over ultra-filtered milk classification seems to be inevitable.

Dairy pricing is a dispute that has appeared to bridge traditional US party lines, creating an unlikely alliance between Trump, New York Democrats Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Sen. Chuck Schumer, and Wisconsin Republicans Gov. Scott Walker and House Speaker Paul Ryan.

Here's what's behind Canada's contentious dairy regulations:

SEE ALSO: 'We're going to get together and we're going to call Canada': Trump went on a huge rant about Canadian dairy

Where did the dispute begin?

Americans have long been complaining about Canadian dairy production. The country uses a supply management system to regulate dairy production and pricing, and it provides regular quotas that monitor supply and demand and helps prevent surpluses and deficits.

Last year, Canada implemented a policy that created a new class of milk prices for ultra-filtered milk, a liquid, high-protein concentrate sometimes used to make products such as cheese and yogurt. Canada lowered the prices for this milk class, so as to incentivize domestic ultra-filtered milk and better compete with the US-produced imports.

The American dairy industry did not take kindly to these developments, and argued that the policy violates NAFTA. The Canadian dairy industry has shot back that the milk reclassification policy did not change import rules nor did it impose any import taxes.

"Canada upholds our international trade obligations. Under the North American Free Trade Agreement, the US has duty-free and quota-free access for milk protein substances, including ultra-filtered milk," Canada's ambassador to the US David McNaughton wrote in a letter to the governors of New York and Wisconsin.

"This duty-free and quota-free access has not changed."



How did this affect the US?

Dozens of dairy producers in Wisconsin and New York say they've been affected by the Canadian policy. Just last week, Grassland Dairy Products cut contracts with about 75 Wisconsin farmers, saying they had lost access to the Canadian market. That access was worth $100 million per year, according to Bloomberg.

The New York-based Cayuga Milk Ingredients also told Bloomberg it had lost all of its Canadian exports, which comprised roughly 30% of its overall sales.

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo implored Trudeau in a letter to develop a national agreement averting what he said would be a $50 million market loss for the state's dairy industry.

"New York's dairy sector is an essential part of our agricultural industry, and these regulations could have devastating effects on our dairy farmers and their families," Cuomo said.

"I urge our Canadian neighbors to reconsider these potentially harmful regulations and to continue our courteous, mutually beneficial trade relations."

The pricing policy has been viewed so negatively by Americans that even Sen. Chuck Schumer tweeted praise for Trump's get-tough approach to Canada:

 



What has Canada's response been?

Although Trump's harsh comments came as a surprise to Canadians, lawmakers have held steady on their milk pricing policy and have vowed to better explain it to the Trump administration when trade negotiations begin.

"The US has a $400 million dairy surplus with Canada, so it's not Canada that's the challenge here," Trudeau said Thursday in an interview with Bloomberg.

"Let's not pretend we're in a global free market when it comes to agriculture … We have a supply management system that works very well here in Canada. The Americans and other countries choose to subsidize to the tune of hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars, their agricultural industries including their dairy."

Ambassador MacNaughton, too, has taken pains to express that Canadian regulations are not the cause of the US dairy sector's losses. He noted in his letter to Cuomo and Walker that the US-Canada trade balance "massively favors the US" by a five-to-one margin, and that global milk overproduction, not Canadian policies, are the problem.

"Dairy farmers globally, and not just in the US, are facing many challenges," he wrote to Cuomo and Walker. "In particular, both Canadian and American farmers have been dealing with international pressures of low world prices, and a surplus of skim milk solids."

Canadian dairy farmers, for their part, have suggested the US is "scapegoating" Canada.

"I feel for the American dairy producers. They're going through a tough time and I think they're looking for someone to blame, and why not Canada?" Ottawa farmer Peter Ruiter told CBC.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

35 movies coming out this summer that you need to see

$
0
0

Wonder Woman Warner Bros final

We’re on the cusp of the summer-movie season, and it's going to come fast.

Last year, the big complaint about summer movies was that too many sequels and reboots turned out to be duds. And though you will surely get some of that this summer, on paper at least, this batch seems promising.

You have highly anticipated sequels like “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2,” “Alien: Covenant” (the sequel to “Prometheus”), and “Despicable Me 3,” and on the reboot side, you have Tom Cruise resurrecting “The Mummy,” The Rock flexing his muscles in “Baywatch,” and Tom Holland as Spidey in “Spider-Man: Homecoming.”

And let’s not forget “Wonder Woman,” Christopher Nolan’s war movie “Dunkirk,” and Luc Besson’s gorgeous-looking sci-fi epic “Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets.”

Here are 35 movies coming out this summer that you need to se:

SEE ALSO: 53 movies you need to see in your lifetime

"Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2" (Release Date: May 5)

Marvel kicks off the summer with the hyped sequel to the studio's surprise 2014 hit. Expect another sweet soundtrack when Chris Pratt returns as Star-Lord, setting off on more adventures with his fellow guardians.



"3 Generations" (Release Date: May 5)

Elle Fanning delivers a powerful performance as a high schooler transitioning from female to male while his mother (Naomi Watts) and grandmother (Susan Sarandon) try to come to terms with the decision.



"King Arthur: Legend of the Sword" (Release Date: May 12)

Charlie Hunnam plays Arthur, the rightful owner of the sword in the stone, in director Guy Ritchie's flashy retelling of the legendary British leader. 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Thousands of people turn out around the world for the March for Science — here are the photos

$
0
0

march for science colorado

Scientists and their supporters are taking to the streets in more than 400 cities and towns around the world on April 22 — Earth Day — to voice their support for the value of scientific inquiry.

The March for Science is expected to draw tens of thousands at its main event on Washington DC’s National Mall. The day started with teach-ins and a rally, and the march will proceed from the Washington Monument grounds to Union Square at 2 p.m. Satellite marches are taking place throughout the day in cities like New York City, London, Sydney, Hong Kong, and Sao Paulo.

The stated goals of the march are to affirm science as a crucial part of a strong democracy, show support for the scientific community, and highlight the value of fact-based inquiry and policy-making. Organizers say the march is not a partisan event, but a large-scale organized action like this is by nature somewhat political — a reality that led some in the scientific community to distance themselves from the event.

Here’s what the marches look like around the world:

SEE ALSO: 20 images that show how much we've reshaped planet Earth in the past 70 years

In Berlin, demonstrators marched from one of the city's universities to the Brandenburg Gate, according to the AP.



Germany’s foreign minister, Sigmar Gabriel, endorsed the March for Science events across the country.



German protestors also gathered in Munich.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

5 things you didn't know you needed for your next workout

$
0
0

The Insider Picks team writes about stuff we think you'll like. Business Insider has affiliate partnerships so we get a share of the revenue from your purchase.

shutterstock_574421614Whether you're looking to make the most of your trip to your gym or prevent injury, the fitness market is filled of tons of tools and accessories you can use to make every phase of your workout easier, more efficient, and safer. 

Have a look at five unexpected things seasoned athletes and fitness rookies alike should consider adding to their gym bags.

SEE ALSO: This company spent two years perfecting gym socks, and it paid off

DON'T MISS: This subscription service makes picking out the right vitamins easier than ever

A pair of compression socks

Avid runners are prone to getting swollen legs, shin splints, and more serious conditions, like achilles tendinitis and plantar fasciitis, which can become a burden on and off the treadmill.

In that vein, you might want to invest in some compression socks. Physix Gear Sport's lightweight socks offer plenty of coverage and provide additional support around the heels and toes. Best of all, this pair has over 2,000 rave reviews on Amazon, so it's arguably one of the best options you can buy.

Physix Gear Sport Compression Socks, $19.99 - $24.99



A foot rocker

Speaking of aches and pains runners fall victim to, you might want to add North American Healthcare's foot rocker to your fitness wish list.

We encourage you to visit a doctor if your conditions persist, but it's also important to stretch your muscles.

This foot rocker's circular bottom puts your foot in an optimal stretching position and makes it easy to alternate between your arches and ankles. According to the company, you can instantly relieve lower body pain by completing three 30-second repetitions.

North American Healthcare Foot Rocker, $11.97



An abdominal cushion

While a strong core can alleviate back pain, increase mobility, and improve your posture, you might not have hours to spend on crunches at the gym.

Enter the Bintiva's wobble cushion. Simply drop it on your work chair, take a seat, and it'll offer the same exercise as a normal stability ball, minus the bulk. If you're able to squeeze in a quick workout, you can also take this to the gym to further work on your abdominals and lower extremities. 

Bintiva Inflated Stability Wobble Cushion, from $14.99



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

21 things you should never say when you meet someone new

$
0
0

coworkersWhether you're introducing yourself to someone at work or meeting a possible client over coffee, your opening words leave a lasting impression.

"Words, poorly and unconsciously chosen, can indeed hurt not only first impressions, but also your credibility, relationships, and opportunities for career advancement," says Darlene Price, president of Well Said Inc., and author of "Well Said! Presentations and Conversations That Get Results."

Price says that when you're nervous, you may speak without thinking, much faster than usual, and say more than is necessary.

While we've all likely experienced foot-in-mouth syndrome at one time or another, keeping these talking points in mind the next time you meet someone new can help you avoid saying the wrong thing:

SEE ALSO: 20 things you should never say to your coworkers

DON'T MISS: 32 things you should never say to your boss

'I hate this company' or 'My boss is a jerk'

Nothing tanks a first impression faster than negativity, Price says. Even when what you say is true, it's best left unsaid in a social or business setting, especially when you're putting your best foot forward in a first-time meeting.

If you have a genuine complaint about someone or something, communicate the issue with the person who can do something about it, such as human resources — not your new contact.



'How much do you make?'

The amount of money a person earns is a very personal matter.

"It's considered rude to ask, and unconscionable on a first encounter," she says. "If you're really that curious, or it's important that you know, instead of committing this faux pas, do some research on sites like GlassdoorPayScale, Salary.com."



'I'm sorry to be a bother'

Why are you saying you're a bother? As Barbara Pachter, an etiquette expert and author of "The Essentials of Business Etiquette,"previously told Business Insider, if you are truly sorry about something you haven't done yet, then why would you go ahead and do it anyway? When introducing yourself, "Excuse me. Do you have a moment?" works much better, she says.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The 15 highest-paying jobs in finance in the US, according to LinkedIn

$
0
0

Wolf of Wall Street Matthew McConaughey Leonardo DiCaprio

It's true that there's a lot of money to be made in finance. But which positions really rake in the big bucks?

In order to find out, LinkedIn collected data using its Salary tool, which asks verified members to submit their salary and collects data on wages.

The only positions featured on the list are those that receive at least 20 salary reports from LinkedIn members in the US. The jobs are all taken from the banking, capital markets, financial services, insurance, investment banking, investment management, venture capital, and private equity industries.

Occupations were then ranked based upon reported median base salaries.

These 15 positions all make a median base salary of over $150,000 a year.

Here are the highest paying jobs in finance:

SEE ALSO: 11 of the most promising jobs of 2017

14. Director of information technology (tied)

Median base salary: $160,000

Organizations currently hiring directors of information technology: Caribbean Resort Company, Aquinas Consulting, and Lucas Group



14. Vice president of sales (tied)

Median base salary: $160,000

Organizations currently hiring vice presidents of sales: Cartwright James, Canvs TV, and NBC Universal Media LLC



13. Vice president of risk management

Median base salary: $161,000

Organizations currently hiring vice presidents of risk management: Virginia Credit Union, Dairy Farmers of America, and E*Trade



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

There are 5 elite US service academies that prepare the next generation of the American military

$
0
0

West Point

Admission into the United States service academies are highly sought after. The United States Military, Naval, Air Force, Merchant Marine, and Coast Guard academies have acceptance rates ranging from 9% to 18%.

In addition to their highly rigorous admissions processes, they enjoy an esteemed reputation for educating and preparing top-ranking members of the US military and intelligence communities for service.

But to gain acceptance, you have to jump through a few more hurdles than you would at traditional colleges.

For instance applicants cannot be married, pregnant, or have any children for whom they have legal responsibility.

The admissions process also starts much sooner than at traditional schools. Beginning in candidates' junior year of high school, they start to fill out questionnaires and begin applying for official nominations. These nominations come from members of Congress, US senators, and the vice president, as well as other military personnel. 

Applicants also undergo a medical assessment that examines both their physical and mental health, and are required to take fitness tests. Most schools require the Candidate Fitness Assessment (CFA), a six-event exam aimed at judging the applicants' physical fitness level.

Read on to learn more about the five US service academies.

SEE ALSO: The 3 most popular majors at every Ivy League school

US Military Academy — West Point, New York

Cadets at the US Military Academy, also referred to as West Point or Army, can major in a broad array of programs including the engineering, business, literature, and the social sciences.

• Tuition fully paid in return for an active-duty service obligation; receive monthly pay as a predetermined percentage of that of a commissioned officer

• 4,348 students

• 10% acceptance rate

• Notable alums: Former US presidents Ulysses S. Grant and Dwight D. Eisenhower, and retired generals David Petraeus and Stanley A. McChrystal



US Naval Academy — Annapolis, Maryland

The most popular majors for midshipmen at Navy include economics, systems engineering, and political science and government.

• Tuition fully paid in return for an active-duty service obligation; receive monthly pay as a predetermined percentage of that of a commissioned officer

• 4,525 students

• 9% acceptance rate

• Notable alums: Former President Jimmy Carter, Arizona Senator John McCain, and businessman and former politician Ross Perot



US Air Force Academy —Colorado Springs, Colorado

Cadets at Air Force take an array of courses with a strong focus on engineering, sciences, and military studies.

• Tuition fully paid in return for an active-duty service obligation; receive monthly pay as a predetermined percentage of that of a commissioned officer

• 4,111 students

• 17% acceptance rate

• Notable alums: NBA head coach Gregg Popovich, Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger, who famously, and safely, landed a US Airways plane in the Hudson River



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The Trump trade looks dead

$
0
0

trump

For real-time odds on the stock market's faith in President Donald Trump, look no further than recent weakness in industries most closely tied to his proposed policies: banks, builders, and retailers.

We're nearly 100 days into Trump's presidency, and the campaign promises of infrastructure spending, tighter restrictions on trade, and lower taxes have yet to materialize.

Additionally, Trump's first major legislative push, the American Health Care Act, failed to garner enough support among Republicans and was pulled from the House floor minutes before a vote.

The defeat on healthcare has led investors to worry that Trump's dealmaking may not be enough to advance his policies through Congress.

The market has not missed this lack of progress. Sectors that would theoretically benefit from Trump's policies, like industrials, have given back a chunk of their postelection gains, while those that would be hurt, like retail, have recently gotten a boost. These moves appear to be investors telling the president they haven't seen enough progress.

Massive investors like Bridgewater and firms like Bank of America aren't helping matters, having thrown cold water on the idea of a seamless implementation as recently as Wednesday.

Even financials, the golden child of the S&P 500 postelection rally that reached as high as 12%, have faltered of late. The same goes for companies that pay the most taxes. A quick glance at trading over the past couple of weeks shows investors are listening to the heavyweights who are now doubling as stock market naysayers.

Here's a further breakdown of the four areas serving as bellwether indicators for the health of the flagging Trump trade:

Investors are beginning to doubt Trump's plans to pass a tax cut that is the "biggest since Ronald Reagan."

The most highly taxed stocks in the US enjoyed a double-digit rally following the election on expectations that Trump would lower the corporate tax rate. During the campaign, the president suggested lowering the rate to 15% from 35%, a cut that would have an outsize impact on companies paying the most.

Since the election, however, Trump has backed off his 15% goal, telling manufacturing CEOs on February 9 the new rate would be "15% to 20%." Additionally, reports suggest that the tax plan could end up with a corporate rate as high as 28%.

Also, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin originally set a deadline of August for the tax overhaul, but Trump, Mnuchin, and top economic adviser Gary Cohn have walked back that promise.

This shift has led to skepticism regarding the promise, Bridgewater Associates said. In a client note on Wednesday, co-CIO Greg Jensen and senior investment associate Atul Narayan said they saw the tax rate landing closer to 25% and were generally anticipating "less impactful tax reform."

Also, count Bank of America among the nonbelievers. The firm conducted a survey, published Wednesday, finding that 21% of fund managers saw a delay in US tax reform as the biggest tail risk to economic growth, more than double from the prior month. As an extension of that, the number of fund managers expecting faster global growth over the next 12 months was "rolling over," according to the note on the survey from Michael Hartnett, BAML's chief investment strategist.

A 50-company basket of highly taxed companies maintained by Goldman Sachs climbed by as much as 14% following the election through March 1. But as skepticism around Trump's proposed measures has mounted, the gauge has fallen by 3.6% from March 1 through Wednesday's close.



Trump said he would spend $1 trillion on infrastructure, but the market isn't so sure it will happen.

Industrial stocks saw one of the US market's biggest spikes following the election, rising by 5.6% in just one week. It showed investors were putting serious faith in Trump's pledge to rebuild the country's infrastructure — an initiative that would have a wide-reaching effect not just on builders but also on engineering firms and raw-material producers.

Trump's campaign promise was to put $1 trillion toward infrastructure spending, and he recently held a meeting with corporate titans on the President's Strategic and Policy Forum regarding the proposed infrastructure spending.

There has been no definitive plans for the spending, and reports suggest the White House is planning to move the investment back to 2018 at the earliest.

In its Wednesday client note, Bridgewater expressed skepticism around the likelihood of immediate action, saying that it would be "slow and difficult to implement."

Stock investors would seem to agree. The S&P 500 Industrials Index, which gained as much as 14% after the election and reached a record high on March 1, has since dropped 3.1% amid mounting pessimism.



Trump repeatedly promised to knock out regulations on businesses, but the companies that would benefit the most are no longer outperforming.

No group benefited more from Trump's victory than financials, and a large part of that is due to expectations of looser regulation.

Trump signed an executive order on February 3 instructing the Treasury Department to look into changing or repealing the Dodd-Frank Act, the largest piece of post-financial-crisis regulation on banks. The president also said on April 4 he wanted to give Dodd-Frank a "haircut."

Despite this, no plans have advanced regarding Dodd-Frank, and members of the Trump administration including Mnuchin and Cohn have suggested that they support a new version of the Glass-Steagall Act that would separate commercial and investment banks.

Looser regulations would be music to JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon's ears. He took a shot at heightened post-financial-crisis regulation in a company earnings call on April 13, arguing that the complex web of government oversight had dampened banks' willingness to lend. Dimon called many of the new rules "hastily developed" and said the result has been a "complex, highly risky and unpredictable operating environment."

The S&P 500 Financials Index surged by as much as 26% after the election through March 1 to its highest level since the start of the bull market in March 2009. But as skepticism around Trump's proposed measures has mounted, the sector had slipped 8.5% from March 1 through Wednesday's close.

The effect of rising interest rates on financial shares should also be noted. The group's gains in the past six months are at least partially attributable to expectations that higher interest income will boost profits for lenders. The Federal Reserve has hiked rates twice since December and has a 73% chance of doing it again as soon as September, according to World Interest Rate Probability data provided by Bloomberg.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Here's how to get verified on Twitter (TWTR)

$
0
0

Jack-Dorsey-First-Tweet

That little blue checkmark next to a Twitter handle has long been held in high esteem.

Originally reserved for the likes of Tony Hawk, San Francisco 311, and NASA's Armstrong Flight Research Center, the checkmark, which denotes a verified account, has become a status symbol.

But it's long been a mystery as to how exactly one attained the coveted blue check.

Starting last summer, Twitter began allowing anyone to apply for a verified account. While this doesn't mean it'll be easier to become verified — according to Twitter, it only approves "account types maintained by users in music, acting, fashion, government, politics, religion, journalism, media, sports, business, and other key interest areas"— the process is at least more straightforward.

Here's how to apply.

SEE ALSO: I used Google Maps to create a list of recommendations for my friends — and you should too

The Centers for Disease Control was one of the first accounts to be verified several years ago. Twitter said it was verified "in order to help citizens find authentic and accurate public health information straight from the source."

Source: Twitter



Oprah was also among the first to get the checkmark, along with Kim Kardashian and the Milwaukee Police.

Source: Twitter



To start your own process, log on to Twitter's support page: support.twitter.com.

From there, click on "My account."



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

This unassuming van is every Nintendo 64 fan's perfect road trip car

$
0
0

Super Mario 64

The 1990s were quite a time.

Somewhere between "Space Jam," the Backstreet Boys and Rock the Vote!, Nintendo released its Nintendo 64 game console.

Despite its many, many shortcomings, the Nintendo 64 is home to some of Nintendo's most beloved games: "Super Mario 64,""GoldenEye 007,""The Legend of Zelda: The Ocarina of Time," and many more.

Having spent many of my formative years with the Nintendo 64, I have a lifelong affinity for the console.

The owner of this highly-customized Chevy 1500 van, however, is clearly a much bigger fan. This is a far cry from your parents' old Dodge Grand Caravan with a flip-down TV screen.

Take a tour of the custom Nintendo 64 van, straight from our mid-'90s dreams.

SEE ALSO: A brand new 'Star Wars' game was just announced — here's everything we know

The van's not a looker.



It's even got a sun-beaten roof.



But inside, it's a whole other world: The world of September 1996!

RAW Embed



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

14 ways HBO's 'Silicon Valley' nailed the real tech industry

$
0
0

Silicon Valley HBO

HBO's "Silicon Valley," which returns to the air tonight, is hilarious, but it's also committed to authenticity — even if it means things get weird sometimes.

To get there, showrunner Mike Judge and his crew employ consultants and even a few real-life startups — in addition to reading tech news from sites, including Business Insider — just to make sure things can be as real as possible.

That means going beyond a few nerdy in-jokes and reflecting the real culture of the actual Silicon Valley, capital of the tech world.

Here's how "Silicon Valley" gets the little things right so it can make some big jokes:

SEE ALSO: I switched from Mac to Windows and I'm not going back — here's why

The thing with HBO's "Silicon Valley" is that it's packed to the brim with little, authentic details that make it sometimes feel almost too real. People in San Francisco and the real Silicon Valley often joke that it feels more like a drama than a comedy.



Right off the bat, "Silicon Valley" nailed the look and feel of the massive campuses of tech titans like Google — the fictional Hooli has a very Google-y aesthetic.



That's down to Hooli's ridiculous kitchens, which mirror those of Silicon Valley's most perk-happy companies ...



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

America has an internet problem — but a radical change could solve it

$
0
0

When the net-neutrality debate hit its peak in the fall of 2014, Ted Cruz wrote a bad tweet:

The Republican senator was torched for this, for many justified reasons. The net-neutrality laws that would be passed in 2015 — which prevent ISPs from blocking, throttling, or prioritizing certain traffic for financial gain — have not let the Fed determine how much you pay for internet service, and banning internet providers like Comcast and Verizon from slowing down websites for profit has never been the same as mandating citizens to buy private health insurance. Cruz’s rationale was wrong.

But with the GOP in control of Washington, and with current Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman Ajit Pai intent on erasing those net-neutrality laws from the books, Cruz hasn’t softened his stance whatsoever. In a FCC oversight hearing last month, he used the phrase yet again as part of a wider call to repeal the net-neutrality laws.

And you know what? The notion of the net-neutrality laws being like Obamacare isn’t that crazy. It wasn’t crazy the first time, either. But Cruz won’t agree with the reason why.

SEE ALSO: Trump’s new FCC boss could have a lasting effect on the internet — here’s what to watch out for

It is very easy to agree with net-neutrality advocates. Conceptually, saying you support net neutrality is like saying you support not murdering people. A Comcast or Verizon squeezing a YouTube — or, more significantly, the next YouTube — for cash, or giving certain traffic preferential treatment, is a potentially disastrous consolidation of power. 

This is why, when you pitch net neutrality purely as a concept, both liberals and conservativestend to say they support it. 

The dangers advocates warn of aren't totally hypothetical: Comcast did try to slow down Netflix, and AT&T does use its status as an ISP to give it services an advantage. It’s important to prevent the current powers from abusing their positions, just as it is in any industry.



The big questions we need to look at, however, are why ISPs are so eager to do that (beyond saying “they’re bad lol”), and how we get to a point where we aren’t having a political war over this issue every four years.

Pai says he objects to the current net-neutrality laws because they classify ISPs as Title II public utilities. The major ISPs have persistently said the enhanced oversight that comes with that will slow their incentive to invest in upgrading their networks. We took our own look at if that’s been true thus far, though, and couldn’t find a definite trend.



Regardless, the larger point is that ISPs need to be incentivized to expand and improve their networks in the first place, because we are only going to increase our dependence on, and usage of, the internet as time goes on.

The current net-neutrality laws dance around that. That they prevent ISPs from discriminating against certain traffic is great, but they effectively accept that the current ISPs are pseudo-monopolies, then ask them to not to make things any worse. They ensure competition on the internet, but they merely hope to expand more diverse access to the internet itself.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider
Viewing all 61683 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images